<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LungBlog : A Breath Away From The Cure &#187; Smoking Cessation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lungblog.com/category/smoking-cessation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lungblog.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gene combination increases risk of lung cancer, particularly in light smokers, CAMH study finds</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/08/gene-combination-increases-risk-of-lung-cancer-particularly-in-light-smokers-camh-study-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/08/gene-combination-increases-risk-of-lung-cancer-particularly-in-light-smokers-camh-study-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=10367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For immediate release – August 17, 2011 (Toronto) – Smokers with variations in two specific genes have a greater risk of smoking more cigarettes, becoming more dependent on nicotine and developing lung cancer, a new study from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) shows. The cancer risk from these two genes appears to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For immediate release – August 17, 2011 (Toronto) – Smokers with variations in two specific genes have a greater risk of smoking more cigarettes, becoming more dependent on nicotine and developing <a title="Gene combination increases risk of lung cancer, particularly in light smokers, CAMH study finds" href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-08/cfaa-gci081711.php" target="_blank">lung cancer</a>, a new study from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) shows.</p>
<p>The cancer risk from these two genes appears to be even higher in smokers who consume 20 or fewer cigarettes a day, according to the study published in the September issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.</p>
<p>CAMH Scientist Dr. Rachel Tyndale and her team studied two genes: the nicotine metabolic gene (CYP2A6) and the nicotinic gene cluster (CHRNA5-A3-B3). These genes have been independently linked to smoking behaviours and lung cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/08/gene-combination-increases-risk-of-lung-cancer-particularly-in-light-smokers-camh-study-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bacterial Link to Lung Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/08/the-bacterial-link-to-lung-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/08/the-bacterial-link-to-lung-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BJALCF News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=10365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Linda Fugate, PhD Some smokers get lung cancer and others do not. The reason for this may involve bacterial infection, according to a review by Dr. Seyed Javad Moghaddam of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and colleagues at three other research institutions. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is the main [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Linda Fugate, PhD</p>
<p>Some smokers get <a title="The Bacterial Link to Lung Cancer" href="http://www.empowher.com/cancer/content/bacterial-link-lung-cancer" target="_blank">lung cancer </a>and others do not. The reason for this may involve bacterial infection, according to a review by Dr. Seyed Javad Moghaddam of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and colleagues at three other research institutions. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is the main culprit, they reported. This pathogen is similar to Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), which is a common cause of meningitis, pneumonia, and ear infections in children who have not been vaccinated against it. The nontypeable variety is missing the polysaccharide capsule present in Hib and other, less common varieties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/08/the-bacterial-link-to-lung-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NicVAX® (Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine)</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/07/nicvax%c2%ae-nicotine-conjugate-vaccine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/07/nicvax%c2%ae-nicotine-conjugate-vaccine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=10339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NicVAX® (Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine) is an investigational vaccine designed as an aid to smoking cessation, as well as an aid to prevent relapses of a treated smoker leading to long-term abstinence. NicVAX represents an extension of our conjugate vaccine technology that allows us to address a significant unmet medical need. We believe that broad commercialization [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;">NicVAX®  (Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine) is an investigational vaccine designed as  an aid to <a title="NicVAX® (Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine)" href="http://www.nabi.com/pipeline/pipeline.php?id=3" target="_blank">smoking cessation</a>, as well as an aid to prevent relapses of a  treated smoker leading to long-term abstinence. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">NicVAX represents an extension  of our conjugate vaccine technology that allows us to address a  significant unmet medical need. We believe that broad commercialization  of NicVAX requires large-scale sales and marketing programs focused on  primary care physicians. As such we have secured an option and license  agreement with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), one of the leading global  pharmaceutical companies. GSK has also depth of vaccine development and  commercialization as well as smoking cessation expertise that should be  an asset in our effort to successfully bring NicVAX to market.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/07/nicvax%c2%ae-nicotine-conjugate-vaccine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Possible Chemopreventive Role for Celecoxib in Lung Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/07/possible-chemopreventive-role-for-celecoxib-in-lung-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/07/possible-chemopreventive-role-for-celecoxib-in-lung-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=10253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celecoxib significantly reduces bronchial Ki-67 labeling index, and may be a potential chemopreventive agent for lung cancer in former smokers, according to a study published in the July issue of Cancer Prevention Research. FRIDAY, July 8 (HealthDay News) &#8212; Celecoxib significantly reduces bronchial Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI), and may be a potential chemopreventive agent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Celecoxib significantly reduces bronchial Ki-67 labeling index, and may be a potential chemopreventive agent for lung cancer in former smokers, according to a study published in the July issue of Cancer Prevention Research.</strong></p>
<p>FRIDAY, July 8 (HealthDay News) &#8212; Celecoxib significantly reduces bronchial Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI), and may be a potential chemopreventive agent for <a title="Possible Chemopreventive Role for Celecoxib in Lung Cancer" href="http://www.doctorslounge.com/index.php/news/pb/21476">lung cancer</a> in former smokers, according to a study published in the July issue of Cancer Prevention Research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2011/07/possible-chemopreventive-role-for-celecoxib-in-lung-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. gene study reveals toll of heavy smoking</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/05/u-s-gene-study-reveals-toll-of-heavy-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/05/u-s-gene-study-reveals-toll-of-heavy-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 18:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=9567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A team at Roche&#8217;s biotechnology unit Genentech in California compared all the genetic changes in a single patient&#8217;s lung tumor with healthy tissue from the patient, a 51-year-old man who had smoked an average of 25 cigarettes per day for 15 years before the tumor was removed. What they found were as many as 50,000 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lungblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Picture-31.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9568" title="Picture 3" src="http://www.lungblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Picture-31.png" alt="" width="223" height="73" /></a>A team at Roche&#8217;s biotechnology unit Genentech in California compared all the genetic changes in a single patient&#8217;s <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64P62Z20100526">lung tumor</a> with healthy tissue from the patient, a 51-year-old man who had smoked an average of 25 cigarettes per day for 15 years before the tumor was removed.</p>
<p>What they found were as many as 50,000 genetic mutations.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fifty thousand is a huge number. No one has ever reported such a high number,&#8221; said Zemin Zhang of Genentech, whose findings appear in the journal Nature.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is likely associated with the smoking history of the patient. It is very alarming,&#8221; Zhang said in a telephone interview.</p>
<p>Smoking is the biggest single cause of lung cancer, and studies suggest mutations occur with each cigarette smoked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/05/u-s-gene-study-reveals-toll-of-heavy-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skinny smokers, beware</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/03/skinny-smokers-beware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/03/skinny-smokers-beware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=9242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SKINNY smokers, beware. Thinner smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer than their fatter counterparts, researchers found in a survey here. And compared with slender non-smokers, slim people who light up are 11 times more likely to contract the disease. But the study&#8217;s lead author, National University of Singapore epidemiologist Koh Woon Puay, emphasised [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SKINNY smokers, beware. Thinner smokers have a higher risk of <a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_503049.html">lung cancer</a> than their fatter counterparts, researchers found in a survey here.</p>
<p>And compared with slender non-smokers, slim people who light up are 11 times more likely to contract the disease.</p>
<p>But the study&#8217;s lead author, National University of Singapore epidemiologist Koh Woon Puay, emphasised that those who smoke are still more likely to contract lung cancer overall than those who do not. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in men here, and the third most common in women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/03/skinny-smokers-beware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ill with terminal lung cancer, ex-slot manager presses for ban</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/02/ill-with-terminal-lung-cancer-ex-slot-manager-presses-for-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/02/ill-with-terminal-lung-cancer-ex-slot-manager-presses-for-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=9044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In April 2008, 60-year-old Cheryl Rose got a bad cough that wouldn’t go away. Her doctors thought she had asthma — a bizarre turn for a woman who had never had difficulty breathing, not even during frequent workouts at the gym. A few weeks later, an X-ray revealed that her right lung was filling with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9045" title="scaledcheryl2_cl_t651" src="http://www.lungblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/scaledcheryl2_cl_t651-300x199.jpg" alt="scaledcheryl2_cl_t651" width="300" height="199" />In April 2008, 60-year-old Cheryl Rose got a bad cough that wouldn’t go away.</p>
<p>Her doctors thought she had asthma — a bizarre turn for a woman who had never had difficulty breathing, not even during frequent workouts at the gym.</p>
<p>A few weeks later, an X-ray revealed that her right <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/feb/14/ill-terminal-lung-cancer-ex-floor-manager-presses-/">lung</a> was filling with fluid at a frightening rate. Doctors told Rose, a woman who lived a healthy lifestyle and had never taken regular medications, that she probably wouldn’t live to see 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/02/ill-with-terminal-lung-cancer-ex-slot-manager-presses-for-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoking Cessation After Lung Cancer Diagnosis Improves Survival</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/02/smoking-cessation-after-lung-cancer-diagnosis-improves-survival/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/02/smoking-cessation-after-lung-cancer-diagnosis-improves-survival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=9028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quitting smoking after a diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer may reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and death. These results were published in the British Medical Journal. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with an estimated 159,000 deaths each year. Smoking cessation is known to reduce a smoker’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9029" title="logo1" src="http://www.lungblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/logo1.jpg" alt="logo1" width="382" height="95" />Quitting smoking after a diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer may reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and death. These results were published in the British Medical Journal.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.indianacancer.com/smoking-cessation-after-lung-cancer-diagnosis-improves-survival/">Lung cancer</a> is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with an estimated 159,000 deaths each year.</p>
<p>Smoking cessation is known to reduce a smoker’s risk of developing lung cancer, but less is known about the effect of smoking cessation after a lung cancer diagnosis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/02/smoking-cessation-after-lung-cancer-diagnosis-improves-survival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quitting Smoking After Lung Cancer Diagnosis Can Prolong Life</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/01/quitting-smoking-after-lung-cancer-diagnosis-can-prolong-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/01/quitting-smoking-after-lung-cancer-diagnosis-can-prolong-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=8936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quitting smoking after being diagnosed with lung cancer can prolong life and reduce the risk of a cancer recurrence or the development of a new lung cancer, according to research published online ahead of print in the British Medical Journal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-8937" title="dangerous-blood-pressure" src="http://www.lungblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dangerous-blood-pressure-150x150.jpg" alt="dangerous-blood-pressure" width="150" height="150" />Quitting smoking after being diagnosed with <a href="http://www.health.am/cr/more/quitting-smoking-after-lung-cancer-diagnosis/">lung cancer</a> can prolong life and reduce the risk of a cancer recurrence or the development of a new lung cancer, according to research published online ahead of print in the British Medical Journal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/01/quitting-smoking-after-lung-cancer-diagnosis-can-prolong-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Act</title>
		<link>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/01/support-lung-cancer-mortality-reduction-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/01/support-lung-cancer-mortality-reduction-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lungblog.com/?p=8908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One out of 14 Americans will be diagnosed with lung cancer during their lifetime. Unfortunately only 16 percent will survive, because the majority will be diagnosed too late, when the cancer has already spread beyond the lungs. Lung cancer remains the country&#8217;s number one cancer killer. It is expected to take the lives of more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One out of 14 Americans will be diagnosed with lung cancer during their lifetime. Unfortunately only 16 percent will survive, because the majority will be diagnosed too late, when the cancer has already spread beyond the lungs. <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20100125/OPINION02/1250319/Support+Lung+Cancer+Mortality+Reduction+Act">Lung cancer</a> remains the country&#8217;s number one cancer killer. It is expected to take the lives of more than 160,000 Americans this year, more than prostate, breast, melanoma, liver and kidney cancers combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lungblog.com/2010/01/support-lung-cancer-mortality-reduction-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

