THE SURVIVAL RATE OF LC IS 15.5%.
THAT’S UNACCEPTABLE. WE’RE
HERE TO CHANGE THAT.

 

Archive for June, 2011

CT Scans Can Help Reduce Lung Cancer Deaths, Study Finds

By Jason Kane at the PBS Newshour

It’s official: CT scans reduce the risk of death for heavy smokers with lung cancer by 20 percent compared to chest X-rays.

After a nearly decade-long study, results from the National Lung Screening Trial were published Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The findings made headlines in November 2010 when the National Cancer Institute announced that it had become clear that the group receiving three-dimensional X-ray tests known as low-dose helical CT scans had a significantly higher chance of surviving than those receiving standard chest X-ray tests.

It’s the first type of screening known to reduce the risk of death from lung cancer, despite a high rate of false positive tests from the scans.

 

No Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

Alternative Pain Therapy for Breast, Prostate and Lung Cancer

MIAMI–(BUSINESS WIRE) Bionucleonics’ lead product Strontium Chloride Sr-89 Injection USP (Strontium-89), which is the generic version of Metastron®, is an option to consider for metastatic cancer bone pain therapy, typically caused by advanced stage breast, prostate or lung cancer.

Strontium Choride Sr-89 Injection USP(Strontium-89) is a radioactive pharmaceutical injection to relieve bone pain in patients with painful skeletal metastases. In the body, Strontium acts similar to calcium and is preferentially taken up in osteoblastic tissue while the unabsorbed isotope is excreted in the urine the first 2 to 3 days following injection, clearing rapidly from the blood and selectively localizing in bone mineral. Uptake of strontium by bone occurs preferentially in sites of active osteogenesis; thus primary bone tumors and areas of metastatic involvement (blastic lesions) can accumulate significantly greater concentrations of strontium than surrounding normal bone.

 

 

No Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

Lung Cancer patients don’t get equal symptom care

By Kerry Grens

NEW YORK | Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:21pm EDT

(Reuters Health) – Lung cancer patients at public hospitals, which serve a greater proportion of poor and disadvantaged people, are less likely to receive adequate treatment for pain and other symptoms than patients treated at a cancer center, according to a new study.

Patients at public hospitals were nine times more likely than the cancer center patients to come in with more-severe symptoms to begin with.

“I think it’s been noted…for the last couple of decades” that cancer “is less well managed in what we consider underserved patients,” said Dr. Charles Cleeland from MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who led the study.

Underserved patients tend to be poor, single, unemployed, non-white, and receiving public assistance health insurance. They also tend to have low levels of formal education.

 

No Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

New Study Spotlights Potential of Virus To Treat Certain Lung Cancer Patients

Source: Oncolytics Biotech

Newswise — A type of virus known as the human reovirus possesses a remarkable trait: It can replicate inside and kill cancer cells that feature a common mutation (known as an “activated Ras pathway”), while leaving the body’s normal cells alone. Now a new study reports that reovirus has the potential to treat certain lung cancer patients, when the reovirus is combined with two other substances known as paclitaxel and carboplatin.

Researchers from The Ohio State University, Georgetown University, and Oncolytics Biotech Inc., a Calgary-based biotechnology company, will present a paper on their findings at the 14th World Conference on Lung Cancer, to be held July 3-7 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The annual meeting is organized by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). The Denver-based IASLC is the only global organization dedicated to the study of lung cancer. Founded in 1972, the association’s membership includes more than 3,000 lung cancer specialists in 80 countries. More than 7,000 participants are expected to attend the 14th World Conference

 

2 Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

Decoding Cancer

By Time Magazine Staff

 

DNA from lung tumors is an especially powerful tool for treatment. Here’s how it helps

 

No Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

New drug gets ‘personal’ with patient’s cancer

BY: DAGNY STUART

1/06/2011 - Paula Hart was just 46 when she starting having shortness of breath, along with a nagging cough and intermittent pain in her left shoulder.

After a trip to the emergency room in her hometown of Evansville, Ind., and a series of additional tests, doctors finally diagnosed Hart with non-small cell lung cancer. The cancer was already advanced — stage IV.

“It was very shocking,” remembered Hart. “I was a recreational smoker. I never smoked full-time and shouldn’t have smoked at all. But I also work with chemicals because I’m a hairdresser.”

No one could tell her what caused lung cancer in such a young woman with a limited smoking history.

 

No Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

Tragara reports lung cancer drug results

by Keith Darce

Lung cancer patients under the age of 65 who received Tragara Pharmaceuticals’ lead experimental drug, Capoxigem, survived three times longer than those taking a placebo, according to results from a Phase 2 trial of the San Diego company’s therapy.

The drug and placebo were given in combination with erlotinib, a chemotherapy drug given to patients with advanced forms of the most common form of non-small cell lung cancer, the most common form of the disease.

 

2 Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

Video: Join the fight against lung cancer at Jill’s Legacy

Join the fight against lung cancer at Jill’s Legacy

 

No Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

Cancer Happens

I’ve written a lot about the stigma of lung cancer. Yet, sometimes our perspectives change. Today I’m writing about the stigma of lung cancer in a new light. From the stance of a recently diagnosed breast cancer patient — me.
On one side, I have had the opportunity to experience a wee trace of the “stigma” of cancer. I’ve also been asked questions. “Do you have a family history of breast cancer?” “How long did you breastfeed your children?” “Were you exposed to pesticides as a child?” Of course nobody has asked if I smoked, or directly implied that I “caused” my cancer. But questions nonetheless.

 

No Comments | Trackback | Permalink

 

OXiGENE releases promising phase two data for lung cancer drug

By Deborah Sterescu

“…Results from a phase II study of Zybrestat showed that patients with non-small cell lung cancer had better response and survival rates.

The controlled, randomized trial, called Falcon, tested Zybrestat in combination with three other treatments, compared to the control arm of the study.

An updated analysis, conducted roughly 11 months after enrollment of the last patient in June of last year, showed that the Zybrestat arm was well tolerated, with no significant cumulative toxicities. The partial response rate was 56% with Zybrestat, and 36% in the standard therapy arm.”

 

No Comments | Trackback | Permalink